Gemini 4 Carbon 夺得 MathArena 桂冠，但成本比 GPT-6.1 Sol 高 15 倍
原文：Gemini 4 Carbon takes the MathArena crown but costs 15 times more than GPT-6.1 Sol
英文正文：点「译成中文」可整篇机器翻译（免费通道，不花钱），翻好永久缓存、下次秒开。
一段时间以来第一次没有 OpenAI 模型领先于 MathArena AI 数学基准。谷歌的 Gemini 4 Carbon 和 Anthropic 的 Fable 5.2 已经将 GPT-6.1 Sol 从榜首击败，尽管两者的成本都高得多。双子座在测试中无视时间限制，几乎从不放弃任务。文章 Gemini 4 Carbon 夺得 MathArena 桂冠，但价格比 GPT-6.1 Sol 贵 15 倍
Matthias Bastian View the LinkedIn Profile of Matthias Bastian
Nov 14, 2026Google's Gemini 4 Carbon has become the first non-OpenAI model in a while to top the MathArena math benchmark. It knocked GPT-6.1 Sol from the top spot, while Claude Fable 5.2 came in second, making it potentially one of the most capable publicly available models for math tasks. OpenAI's models, which recently allegedly solved demanding equations like the Navier-Stokes equations , aren't publicly available yet.
Gemini 4 Carbon's most common failure mode is exceeding the time limit. The model also almost never gives up on a task, a trait that can be read as either positive or negative . In one case, it launched a script that ran for more than eleven hours without checking on its progress. That extra performance comes at a price, though. With the reasoning settings used in testing, Carbon and Fable 5.2 cost roughly 15 and 40 times as much as GPT-6.1 Sol, respectively.
| Recommendation | Model | Provider | Release date | Expected performance | Expected cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 overall | Gemini 4 Carbon (high) | November 10, 2026 | 85.4% ±3.0% | $15.70 ±$1.33 | |
| #2 overall | Claude-Fable-5.2 (max) | Anthropic | November 9, 2026 | 82.8% ±5.3% | $40.20 ±$2.59 |
| #3 overall | GPT-6.1 Sol (max) | OpenAI | September 29, 2026 | 80.6% ±2.7% | $1.07 ±$0.018 |
| Best open model | Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) | Moonshot AI | October 23, 2026 | 54.3% ±5.8% | $3.70 ±$0.27 |
AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans
Subscribe now Source: Jasper Dekoninck via X
正文由本站服务器抓取保存（已自动过滤广告、推荐位与追踪图片），排版与原站可能不同；版权归原站所有。
